Background & Situation Menu
Status and Trends in Fisheries and their Habitats Threats, root causes and barrier analysis Institutional, sectoral and policy context Stakeholder mapping and analysis Baseline analysis and gaps Known Areas of Critical Significance to the Life-Cycles of Fisheries Resources Priority Fisheries Refugia Areas
Establishment of Fisheries Refugia in Malaysia:
Background and Situation Analysis to Support
Baseline analysis and gaps
The experience of Malaysia with a lack of compliance with no-take ‘MPAs’ was the entry point to efforts to improve the basis for integrated fish stock and habitat management in Malaysia. Particularly this experience laid stress on the importance of focusing on the concepts of sustainable use and fishery-critical habitat linkages in communicating with government officials and coastal fishing communities in Malaysia about spatial fisheries management tools. It was noted by the Department of Fisheries that these are more easily understood and likely accepted at the fisheries community level than either the science of no-take areas or the concept of biodiversity and its conservation.
Stakeholder consultations involving representatives from local government units, regional government agencies, law enforcers, fisherfolk organization, non-governmental organizations, and national fisheries committee members have been undertaken and resulted in: the identification of goals and objectives for the priority refugia sites identified above; and a high level of stakeholder support for the establishment of the refugia approach in Malaysia.
Key gaps that have been identified include needs for:
Enhanced national coordination mechanism to accommodate overarching responsibility for the establishment of national fisheries refugia;
Strengthened enabling environment for the formal designation and operational management of fisheries refugia;
Improved national and site-level science and information base to support evidence-based planning and operational management; and
Development of practical experience in the designation and management of fisheries refugia sites
Key gaps that have been identified include needs for:
Enhanced national coordination mechanism to accommodate overarching responsibility for the establishment of national fisheries refugia;
Strengthened enabling environment for the formal designation and operational management of fisheries refugia;
Improved national and site-level science and information base to support evidence-based planning and operational management; and
Development of practical experience in the designation and management of fisheries refugia sites